Psychological Safety Climate Assessment
Measure how safe your team environment feels for speaking up, taking interpersonal risks, and learning from mistakes — the conditions that research links to team learning, innovation, and sustained high performance.
This assessment measures your individual perception of your team's psychological safety climate. Psychological safety is a team-level construct — it describes the shared belief within a team about whether interpersonal risk-taking is safe.
Your results reflect your experience of how your team operates — not a personal personality trait. There are no correct answers. People on the same team may answer differently, and both can be valid.
Complete this with a specific team in mind — the team most central to your current role.
- Your personality, courage, or confidence
- How much you like your team members
- Team harmony or conflict level
- High psychological safety does not mean comfortable or unchallenging — it means people can take interpersonal risks without fear of punishment
Voice & Speaking Up
Feeling safe raising concerns, asking questions, and expressing dissent
Interpersonal Risk-Taking
Admitting mistakes, acknowledging uncertainty, and showing vulnerability
Inclusion & Respect
All perspectives are genuinely welcomed and valued regardless of role
Learning Orientation
Treating mistakes and setbacks as learning opportunities rather than failures
Begin Your Assessment
Your responses are private. We never sell personal data.
Your Team's Safety Climate
Based on Edmondson's Psychological Safety framework
Safety Zone Model
Edmondson's research describes team effectiveness as a function of both psychological safety and performance standards. Your safety score places you on the horizontal axis below.
Safety zone placement is based on your climate score. Performance context should be assessed separately. For team diagnostics, aggregate responses from multiple team members.
What Psychological Safety Enables
Edmondson's foundational research and subsequent work by Frazier et al. (2017) consistently find that teams with higher psychological safety show more creativity, greater willingness to share information across role boundaries, higher learning rates, and stronger performance on complex, interdependent tasks. The effect is especially pronounced in knowledge work and environments where adaptation matters more than routine execution.
Psychological safety does not mean low standards or conflict-free relationships. The highest-performing teams in Edmondson's research combined high psychological safety with high performance pressure — they were candid, challenging, and demanding, precisely because speaking up felt safe.
For Leaders
If you are a leader or manager, your behavior is the primary driver of your team's psychological safety climate. Amy Edmondson's research identifies three categories of leader behavior that most strongly shape safety perceptions:
Inviting input: Explicitly asking for ideas, concerns, and questions — especially from quieter voices. Curiosity signals that speaking up is welcome.
Responding non-punitively to bad news: How you react when someone raises a problem or admits a mistake is the single most powerful signal your team observes. Even subtle expressions of irritation or dismissal reduce future candor.
Modeling fallibility: Openly acknowledging your own uncertainty, mistakes, and limitations. Leaders who project invulnerability signal to others that vulnerability is not safe.
Team context note: A single individual's perception is valuable for individual coaching but does not constitute a team-level safety score. For team diagnostics, aggregate responses from 3–5+ team members using the same assessment, then compare and discuss variance across individuals — variance itself is meaningful data about shared versus fragmented safety perceptions.
Receive Your Team Safety Climate Report
Enter your email to receive a summary of your psychological safety climate results with coaching recommendations.